1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 10, 2006, the Plaintiff made a subcontract to the Defendants for the construction of reinforced concrete structure (hereinafter “instant subcontracted construction”) among the new construction of apartment units with 10 households on the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D ground, with the construction cost of KRW 240 million, and ② the construction cost is to be paid to the Defendants. 101, 102, 201, 202, 201, 202, 301, 302, 302, 401, and 7 households with the Plaintiff’s total amount of KRW 201,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant arrangement”). B.

On May 11, 2006, the Defendants paid KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff pursuant to the instant agreement, but the Plaintiff did not supply materials, such as ready-mixed, and the Defendants directly purchased them and carried out construction work. In addition, the Defendants paid KRW 19 million to the Plaintiff upon the Plaintiff’s request that they would directly pay materials and labor expenses on May 18, 2006, but the Plaintiff did not use them for the aforementioned purposes.

C. When the Defendants were unable to receive the above loans and the construction cost from the Plaintiff at the time, they filed a lawsuit with Seoul Western District Court 2007Da63686, which sought the implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer regarding the above E-Ba. In the above case, the above court was proceeding by service by publication, and the Defendant (referring to the Plaintiff) on February 5, 2008, is the Defendants of this case.