logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.10.13 2016고정330
명예훼손
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a director of the board of directors of the school foundation D, attended the fourth meeting of the board of directors of the school foundation D, held in the office of the chairperson of the school foundation D in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, on July 17, 2014, and attended the fourth meeting of the board of directors of the school foundation D in Seongbuk-gu, and the chief director, four directors, and auditors. The facts do not exist that the victim F distributed printed printed items that are friendly to the president of the G Institute D, which is a school foundation D, to the principal of the school foundation D, and that there was no confirmation as to the authenticity thereof, the victim refers to the victim and there was no confirmation as to whether the former president of the school foundation D, "I think that he would be no longer entitled to promote the founder of the school to teach him." "I want to make the former founder of the school, who is a professor of the school foundation D in Seongbuk-gu, who is a professor of the school foundation D in Seongbuk-gu, and there is only a copy of the F, anywhere, to enter this meeting materials, and to publicly announce the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statement (the part to recognize the fact of speaking);

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Minutes of directors;

1. The fact-finding inquiry reply [the defendant asserts that his remarks were not false and have no performance. The defendant asserts that only the materials submitted by the defendant (Evidence Nos. 3 and 4) have distributed printed materials that the victim helps the head of G private teaching institute in a pro-Japanese or it is difficult to recognize a considerable reason to believe that this fact is true. As a result, the defendant's remarks are false and the defendant had doluences as to the falsity, and the illegality of the above act is determined to have been committed at least on a different premise (Article 310 of the Criminal Act).

arrow