The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendants is published.

Summary of Facts charged

1. No defendant A shall be entrusted with a rearrangement project without registering the rearrangement project management business to the Mayor/Do Governor;

The Defendant, as a director of the company B, was entrusted with the rearrangement project management business without registering the rearrangement project management business under the name of the company at issue on March 26, 2013, despite the fact that the registration of the rearrangement project management business was voluntarily returned to the Gyeonggi-do Governor and the registration of the rearrangement project management business was revoked on or around the 27th of the same month, the Defendant was entrusted with the rearrangement project management business without registering the rearrangement project management business under the name of the company at Pyeongtaek-si F around July 8, 2014.

2. Defendant B was a corporation established for the purpose of acting as a housing association service agent, and was entrusted with the rearrangement project without registering the rearrangement project management business at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Maz.

1. Facts recognized;

A. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

O. B (hereinafter “B”) completed the registration of the rearrangement project management business on September 9, 2003. On December 6, 2008, the G Housing Redevelopment Project Association and the Korea Housing Redevelopment Project Association entered into a basic service contract with KRW 2 billion on the “Special Management and Traffic Impact Assessment” (Additional Tax). On August 2009, around August 2009, the said basic service contract entered into the first modification contract with the content that added KRW 167,812,00 (Additional Tax) to the service work added pursuant to Articles 8 and 9 of the said basic service contract.

O) Since then B performed some of the services in accordance with the above services contract, the partnership suspended its business on the first half of 2003, such as long-term intrusion in the real estate market, and failed to pay the service cost for the services performed in B.

OB is not paid the service cost.