1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, in addition to changing or adding the following judgments, thereby admitting the judgment of the first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The first instance court's 6th sentence 8 to 7th sentence is as follows.

The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the facts without any dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 25 through 30, the appraisal results of the first instance appraiser H and F, and the purport of the whole pleadings in the inquiry results about the appraiser F of the first instance trial. (i) Construction costs incurred by the plaintiff are KRW 234,898,475 in total as follows:

(1) Temporary installation and removal works: 81,940,00 won for steel structure works: 101,96,057 additional expenses for steel structure works: 26,076,563 won [26,076,563 won (=52,454,883 - 26,378,320 won) plus expenses for interim processing, transportation, etc. for blade D D Down Corporation (including value-added tax): 40,68,7125 won: 10,76,563 won [26,784, 3784, 3784, 4784, 297, 3784, 294, 367, 294, 784, 297, 784, 79, 706 won]

Therefore, the Defendant filed an application for modification of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim with respect to the Plaintiff’s remainder of KRW 148,413,731, excluding the construction cost of KRW 190,00,000, and the remainder of KRW 122,337,168, as well as the Plaintiff’s remainder of the construction cost of KRW 190,000,000.