logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.25 2014고단8940
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the above defendant did not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.1 day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around the end of 2006, the defendant worked as an instructor at a driving school operated by the victim D (V, the age of 41) and became a relationship with the victim.

On September 23, 2013, the Defendant, around September 23:0, 2013, called the victim's house located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, that he would not enter the victim's house, and was making a dispute while making a house, and the Defendant was taking care of the victim's face for about six weeks, and was taking care of the victim's face for drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the second protocol of the trial;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of suspect examination of the accused (No. 19 of the evidence list);

1. Statement made by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Application of each written diagnosis, written confirmation of medical treatment, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of a fine concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order. The defendant asserted that the defendant was not caused the victim's face with his/her finger floor on September 9, 2013 when he/she was aware of and caused the victim's face, and thus, he/she did not cause the closed pelke. Thus, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above were revealed by the prosecutor's office that the defendant caused the victim's face with his/her left hand on September 9, 2013. In other words, the defendant stated that the victim was wrong because he/she had taken the victim's face with his/her free hand on September 23, 2013. The victim was issued a medical certificate to the effect that he/she suffered from the F Hospital G on September 23, 2013 by adding the above medical certificate to the degree that it is difficult to obtain the victim's face with the same additional injury.

arrow