Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 28, 2013, from around 17:30 to 18:05 of the same day, the Defendant stated that the victim E, who is an employee, wanted to be a resident, should be given an identification card to the victim E, and then, the victim F, the team leader, was able to take a bath to the victim E, and damaged the floor by cutting down the brye on the floor of the victim F, which was on the horse Tratter, and was tightly sealed by the victim F, and prevented customers from entering.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with soup business of victims by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged (definite) is that the victim E demands the presentation of identification card at the time and place of the facts charged in the judgment of the Defendant, and that the victim is deemed to have different customers, and that the victim is a short-term market.

60 60 602

(z) Doese, n.e., the market;

(1)"Publicly insulting the victim";

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment can be prosecuted only upon the complaint of the victim pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the agreement submitted by the defense counsel of the defendant to this court on July 3, 2013, which is the date of the prosecution of this case, the victim E expressed his/her intent not to punish the perpetrator any longer because the victim agreed with the perpetrator in connection with this case. It is reasonable to see that the victim has withdrawn his/her previous wishing to punish the defendant. Accordingly, the above facts charged can be prosecuted only upon the complaint.