1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against F, G, H, and E to the effect that the ownership transfer registration procedure was implemented on October 1, 2008 on the ground that the prescription period for possession acquisition was completed on October 24, 201 by filing a lawsuit to the effect that the ownership transfer registration procedure was completed on October 24, 201, for the following reasons: (a) the portion (a) of the ship connecting F, G, H, H, and E in sequence of each point of the attached drawing No. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, and 2; and (b) the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2011.

(hereinafter “the final judgment of this case”). (b)

On the other hand, on December 30, 201, part of the land in a ship was divided from 65,157 square meters of J-based forest to 10,574 square meters of J-based forest and became subject to registration conversion into 10,977 square meters of J-based forest.

1. On January 25, 2012, J Forest No. 10,977 square meters were divided into the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 9,954 square meters, K Forest No. 232 square meters, real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3, and real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 4. On January 25, 2012, the said J Forest No. 9,954 square meters was divided into real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 on December 3, 2013 and real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 5 on December 3, 2013, and the said J Forest No. 23 square meters was divided into real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 in the separate sheet No. 126 square meters on December 3, 2013.

C. According to the instant final judgment, the Defendant completed the ownership transfer registration based on the prescriptive acquisition on October 1, 2008 (hereinafter “instant ownership transfer registration”) with the Changwon District Court No. 184, which was received on January 3, 2012, with respect to the real estate listed in the attached list, as to the real estate in the attached list, (i) pursuant to the instant final judgment.

[Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 or 3 evidence (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs asserted that they have a loan claim against E, and as to E's share out of the real estate stated in the attached list to E.