1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: The plaintiff’s argument about this case is added to the following judgments, and the plaintiff’s “the plaintiff” of the first instance court Nos. 14, 18, and 4 as “the defendant,” respectively, is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the use of “the plaintiff” of the third, third, 18, and 4 of the judgment of the first instance as “the defendant.”

2. The Plaintiff asserted that, among the Defendant’s loans to D, only KRW 65 million on May 12, 201, the Plaintiff created a collateral on the instant house, and that only KRW 25 million on May 11, 201, and KRW 50 million on June 27, 201, including KRW 25 million on May 11, 201, and KRW 25 million on June 27, 201, offered an apartment ownership to the Defendant as separate collateral. However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, such as the written evidence No. 7 and No. 8, is insufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to prove it otherwise.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.