1. The defendant shall pay 35,000,000 won to the plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

1. Judgment on the parties' arguments

A. Determination as to the cause of the claim 1) 1 and 2 sees the purport of the entire entries and arguments, the Plaintiff and C (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”)

(3) On January 7, 2015, E.W. D 204 (hereinafter “instant leased house”) from the Defendant

(2) The Plaintiff, etc. and the Defendant agreed to refund the full amount of the lease deposit to the Plaintiff at the time of the termination of the lease as of January 31, 2015, with respect to the lease deposit KRW 35 million and the lease period from January 31, 2015, and from January 30, 2017. At the time, the Plaintiff, etc. and the Defendant agreed to refund the lease deposit from the Plaintiff on December 2, 2016, although the Defendant received a request from the Plaintiff for the return of the lease deposit due to the expiration of the lease period, it can be recognized that the Plaintiff did not return the lease deposit to the Plaintiff until then, and there is no counter-proof. 2) According to the above recognition, the lease period for the leased house of this case expires, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff KRW 35 million.

B. The defendant's assertion that the defendant did not receive KRW 5.30,00 from the plaintiff as management expenses and water fees, but it is not sufficient to acknowledge it only with the statement No. 1, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, according to the evidence No. 3 and evidence No. 2, it is recognized that the plaintiff paid all the management expenses and water fees incurred until July 31, 2017 to the defendant. Thus, the defendant's argument cannot be accepted.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim can be accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition by admitting it.