logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.12.01 2016고정1320
모욕등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, from September 15, 2015 to around 13:30 on September 15, 2015, the victim D, a special guard unit of the same C, who was in a toilet, is equal to the amount of money, from the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion of the portion.

Does the defect, nameless civil petitioners have been heard, Doz. Doctrine of the preceding swine machine, Doctrine;

Habk wlok walk walk walp walp walp walp walp walp walp walk

I think walk walp

Sheba war farb

In a large sense, the victim publicly insultingd the victim.

2. On November 2015, the Defendant defamation: (a) in the smoking district of the building of the Prime Minister of the building of the Sejong-si government office, which was formed by the special self-government of Sejong-si around 21:00; (b) is a member of the special security guards belonging to the same company; and (c) “I would like to say B would immediately be fright at a special war group.”

“The facts are asked to question, and the victim D did not make a sexual speech to the victim D, and even though the victim D did not make such a speech to the defendant or any other person, the victim D damaged the victim D’s reputation by publicly pointing out false facts by saying, “B is sexually high level of sexually high to the victim of this women’s special security guards (members of women’s special security guards) and sexually farcing him, and her farcing him. The victim D working in the 6-3 zone farcing zone farcing, and the victim D attempted to make a recording with the handphone by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

【Contempt】

1. Each legal statement made by witness D and F (a point of defamation against victim D)

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act, and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for a crime;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.

arrow