beta
Text
1. The Defendants: (a) from August 5, 2016 to Defendant B with respect to each of the Plaintiff KRW 62.1 million; and (b) Defendant C with respect to August 6, 2016.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B, D, and E
(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;
(b) Grounds (1) Defendant B and D: Judgment based on the recommendation of confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act), Defendant E: Decision by service by publication (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)
2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C
A. (1) On February 18, 2016, Defendant C was convicted of violation of the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission or Registration, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time. The criminal facts of Defendant C, etc. are referred to as “F” under the name of a group and conspired to receive money from an unspecified number of unspecified persons under the name of a group after establishing a group, under the name of the group, under the name of the group, to receive money for investment, and then he was in charge of managing eight points under the name of the group as “representative,” and Defendant C was in charge of performing the direction of Defendant B, etc., including the beginning, Jeju, and Cheongju, etc., under the name of “representative,” and Defendant C was in charge of performing the duty of managing eight points under the command of Defendant C, etc., and not engaging in the business of importing money by promising to make an investment amount in the future or an investment amount exceeding an unspecified number of unspecified number of persons, from around 200 to 36.5.25.
(2) The Plaintiff invested a total of KRW 62,100,000 in the name of G, the Plaintiff and the incompetent, but did not receive a refund of the said investment amount, upon the recommendation of Defendant C, etc., to the effect that “the listing of the unlisted company bypassing the merger with the listed company may result in a profit from the stock price if it was listed by acquiring the company and listing it,” and the Plaintiff’s damage as above is attached to the above criminal judgment against Defendant C.