logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.11.15 2017고단974
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

(b) there was no intention or ability to perform the distribution work normally even upon receipt of the request;

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 60,000 won to the above account in the name of the defendant under the name of the construction cost on the same day from the victim.

(c)

On January 5, 2016, around January 5, 2016, the defrauded made a false statement that “Around January 5, 2016, the Defendant sent a phone call to the victim, and “Around January 5, 2016, the Defendant made it false to lend only three million won to the victim with the knowledge of the cost of construction having been doing construction works in another place.”

However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay normally even if he borrowed money from the damaged person, such as the statement 1-A.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred three million won to the above account in the name of the defendant under the name of the victim on the same day from the victim.

2. On December 24, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim in the victim F’s residence of the victim F, stating that “1.2 million won is to be done by putting up a house at home” to the victim at the victim’s residence of the victim F.

However, even if the defendant receives the construction cost from the injured party, as described in paragraph 1-A, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to normally carry out the work.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 1.2 million won to the above Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the defendant under the name of the construction cost on the same day from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. Details of the principal of each complaint, certificates of the results of transactions of deposits in North Korean banks before the complainants, and transactions of deposits and deposits;

1. Previous records: Investigation report (Attachment of criminal suspects' judgments, etc. - Attachment of criminal suspects' judgments, etc.), application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as inquiries about criminal history

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347(1) of the same Act concerning the crime, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine.

arrow