Defendants are innocent.

1. On May 27, 201, at the Daegu D Service Center around 09:15, the Defendants: (a) demanded a factual verification of the fact that the victim E (the victim South, the 1975 student) paid the fare after getting on board the railroad; and (b) demanded the Defendant A to refuse to comply with this request; (c) the victim copied the manual at the office of the service; (d) the Defendant A was faced with the wheelchairs of the victim by pushing the wheelchairs for the victim who copied the manual; (c) the victim was faced with the victim’s bridge; (d) the victim tried to continuously copy the manual; and (e) the Defendant B was unable to prevent the victim’s duplication; and (e) attached the victim’s bridge to the victim’s bridge, and (e) attached the victim’s wall to the wall, and (e) attached the victim’s bridge to the shape of the victim’s bridge.

2. Determination

A. As indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, we examine whether Defendant A was faced with the wheelchairs of E by pushing ahead the wheelchairs, and whether Defendants were faced with the bridge of E by cutting off the bridge of E, cutting off the bridge of E, cutting off the bridge with the wall of E, and pushed off the bridge part with the wall of E.

B. As above, there is a statement in E’s investigative agency as evidence that the Defendants abused and injure E.

(c)

However, in full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the instant facts charged were proven without reasonable doubt by only the E’s statement and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① On July 5, 2011, E was a assault against the Defendants on the day of the instant case, and he was assaulted by the Defendants on the day of the instant case.

In this regard, the Defendants asserted against the Defendants.