The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Error of facts and misapprehension of legal principles presented by the defendant to the victims of this case, the SBLC of this case (SBL), which was lawfully issued from Qubank N.A. Quzon-Head Office, and the Korea SWIFT received MT760 through SWIT, and as such, the details received through SWIFT are restricted to confirmation of the parties other than banks. Thus, the defendant presented the SBLC of paper containing the same contents as those of the above M760 to the victims, and thus, the court below found the defendant guilty of each of the facts charged of this case. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending facts or by misapprehending legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Each sentence sentenced by the court below on the grounds that the sentence of unfair sentencing (the sentence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, and 7 in the original judgment: imprisonment of two years and six months, and imprisonment of one year and six months: imprisonment of one year and six months) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The court below rejected the above argument by stating in detail the defendant's assertion and its judgment under the title "the judgment on the defendant's argument" in the judgment of the court below, which is the same as the above reasons for appeal. In light of the above records, the judgment of the court below is just and it is reasonable to compare the above judgment with the records, and it is difficult for the court below to deny the defendant's intention to acquire the defendant's document alone, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts or by misunderstanding the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. Part of the instant crime claiming unfair sentencing is an attempted crime, and the victimO was paid KRW 100 million out of the amount of damage by the Defendant, and the victim T is entitled to receive KRW 100 million from the original court.