1. The Defendant: KRW 23,33,025 to Plaintiff A; KRW 2,00,000 to Plaintiff B; KRW 1,000,000 to Plaintiff C and D; and each of the above.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. As seen earlier, Plaintiff A is a patient who has undergone the instant high-frequency procedure by the Defendant.

Plaintiff

B is the husband of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff C and D are the children of the Plaintiff.

The defendant is a medical specialist in Dasan-si who operates the Gneology medical clinic located in the F (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant hospital").

B. On September 23, 2011, Plaintiff A asked the Defendant to undergo the instant high-frequency surgery against Plaintiff A (hereinafter “the instant high-frequency surgery”). As a result of the Plaintiff’s implementation of the X-ray test on the part of the Plaintiff’s main base date and CT test, the Defendant diagnosed the Plaintiff’s main base of the instant high-frequency surgery (hereinafter “the instant high-frequency surgery”). The Defendant diagnosed the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s climatic change, such as the reduction of the pelle and disc height; and (b) the instant high-frequency surgery by the vertebrocul cin inverte in the verte of the 4-5 verteculty; and (c) the instant high-frequency surgery by means of treating it (hereinafter “the instant high-frequency surgery”).

(2) On September 23, 201, the Defendant was to implement the operation on the second floor of the Defendant Hospital, 201, putting the Plaintiff at the operation room located on the second floor of the Defendant Hospital, and disinfected the Plaintiff using alcohol and spokes around the 4-5 square, using alcohol and spokes, and inserted the epode to the spores in the sporesporesponding part of the sporesporesponding part of the sporesporesporesponding part of the sporesporespos.

After the Defendant’s implementation of the instant high-frequency procedure to Plaintiff A for about 40 minutes, the Plaintiff Company her gress from the operating room and entered the hospital with the fourth floor of the Defendant Hospital and hospitalized the Plaintiff.

C. The Plaintiff A’s occurrence and treatment of side farming and the discharge at the Defendant Hospital 1, while being hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, was in prison and her arms every day during the period of being hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and the size of her amb and her amb and her amb, which is larger than the start of the occurrence of her amb and her amb, which is suitable for injection

Accordingly, the plaintiff A was hospitalized at the defendant hospital on October 7, 201 for the above farming treatment.