The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable as to the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. The following facts are favorable circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of and reflect against the instant crime; (b) while the act of arranging sexual trafficking does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women’s sex; (c) in light of the circumstances and contents of the instant crime; (d) the fact that the nature of the instant crime is very poor; (b) the period or scale of the instant crime is not large; and (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime for the business purposes around May 11, 2007, by taking into account the fact that there was a history of 2 years and 6 months sentenced to imprisonment for the crime of violating the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (mediation, etc.); and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and environment; and (e) records and arguments before and after the instant crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.