A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

At around 22:40 on September 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the police officer belonging to the Ansan-gu Police Station, who was called up after receiving 112 reports that customers scam a scam at a D restaurant located in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, sent the Defendant’s scambling, and recommended him to return home; and (b) expressed his desire to “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY YY Y YY Y

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts of the case-related photographic statute, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment

1. Scope of the sentencing guidelines set forth in Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the suspended sentence (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act, including the fact that a large number of defendants were the same as the previous ones, that the defendant is led to confession and reflect by the defendant, and that the defendant supports the open source by neglecting the defendant

1. It shall be decided as per the disposition for the reason under Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act, and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;