Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor and two months) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is deeply divided and reflected in his/her depth; and (b) supports the father of the aged who suffers from dementia.

However, each of the crimes of this case is that the defendant drives a vehicle again without obtaining a driver's license, and the responsibility for the crime is very heavy, and the blood alcohol level at the time of this case was significantly high 0.268% and 0.269%, and the defendant has been punished several times due to drinking driving and without a driver's license, and the crime committed on August 2, 2013 was committed again during the same repeated period, and is disadvantageous to the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence, and all of the sentencing conditions such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not deemed unfair to the extent that the sentence of the court below is reversed.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.