logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.19 2017고단1942
폭행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2017, at around 15:10, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim’s shoulder and body part when the victim D (the 31-year age), and the clibb in the course of boarding the C bus platform operated in Seoyang-do, Seoyang-si, Nam-gu, Seoul, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-do, on the shuttle bus platform; and (b) when the clib was brought about by the victim who was aboard the bus, as the clib was brought about by his hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of video Acts and subordinate statutes in the form of damage;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the favorable circumstances of the reasons for sentencing as follows) of the suspended sentence (the scope of the punishment under law), [the scope of the punishment under law] imprisonment with prison labor for not more than two years [the scope of the punishment under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act] [the scope of the punishment under recommendation] of the assault crime among the violent crime group / [the scope of the recommended punishment] basic area: From February to October [the sentence] in March 16, 2017, the defendant, who was sentenced to the suspended sentence one year, committed assaulting another person on January 16, 2017 and received a summary order of a fine of KRW 500,000 on May 17, 2017 (see, e.g., Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 1982).

The damage was not recovered.

However, considering the fact that the defendant led to an offense and that there is no other criminal record except the above summary order, the sentence was imposed on the defendant.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. The summary of the charge of assault on January 29, 2017 among the facts charged in the instant case is the family head, and the victim E is the victim E is the part-time recipient of F.

On January 29, 2017, the Defendant committed assault, such as, within the “F control point” located in G at the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, G around 14:00, the Defendant committed assault against the said victim by ordering orders, such as coffee, etc. with the victim’s face, threatening the said victim’s chest back to the victim’s face, resulting in friendly acid.

2. We examine the judgment, and the facts charged constitute Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow