logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.04.20 2015가단25970
제3자이의
Text

1. The original copy of the order of payment with executory force of the lease deposit case No. 2014 tea 10171 against the defendant C.

Reasons

1. The gist of the plaintiff's assertion: The movable property listed in the separate sheet is the plaintiff.

The Plaintiff asserts that compulsory execution against the instant movable on May 7, 2015, based on the Defendant’s executory payment order of the lease deposit case No. 2014 tea 10171, which was in the attached list in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building (hereinafter “instant movable”) based on the premise that the Defendant’s movable in the attached list (hereinafter “instant movable”) is one’s own ownership, should be denied as it is erroneous.

2. Determination: E/he accepted the Plaintiff’s claim No. 0 No. 4, Sept. 30, 2009; (1) an agreement was made to title trust the ownership of the land and building with respect to C, which lent KRW 750,000,000,000,000 to the Plaintiff, out of KRW 1.6 billion; and (2) E/he agreed to lend KRW 790,000,000,000 from KRW 1.133,000,000,000 to the Plaintiff; (30,000,000,000 won from KRW 1.5,000,000 to the Plaintiff; and (4) according to the evidence No. 0. 2, E/he purchased the instant movable property from KRW 1,500,000,000,000 from KRW 1,500,000,000,000 from KRW 2,00.

arrow