The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts), the fact that continued explanation of the CCTV restoration process at a kindergarten is recognized, and the damage compensation was made by the payment of hospital expenses, etc. for the damage of E, the defendant accused of the kindergarten to the Office of Education or posted a notice to the same purport repeatedly without waiting to answer the result of the disposition after filing a complaint with the police, the contents of the notice, and the statement about the facts before and after the defendant's person's complaint, which are false and lacks credibility in the defendant's statement, the defendant's act is the primary purpose of defamation, but the defendant's act is not the purpose of defamation or is related to the public interest, and thus, the court below acquitted the defendant on the ground that

2. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty on the grounds that the Defendant’s act did not constitute a purpose of slandering the facts charged in the instant case by stating the reasons for innocence in detail, or that it was a true act with respect to the public interest, and there is no illegality,

In light of the evidence, a thorough examination of the judgment of the court below in light of the evidence, and in light of the background leading up to the Defendant’s posting the same article as that written in the facts charged, and the contents of the posted article, the above judgment of the court below is acceptable, and there is no error of law by mistake of facts as

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.