logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2016.08.17 2016고단492
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) borrowed the Defendant, on January 13, 2015, concluded that, while working for a c church located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Youngdo as a Dogdogdogdog; (b) “Around January 13, 2015, the Defendant would lend KRW 10 million to Dogggggggggggggggggggs D

However, the Defendant did not have any intent to use the said money as the cost of concluding a provisional contract even if he did not have any other party to the contract for the purchase of electric power units, and did not have any intent to use it as the cost of concluding a provisional contract. As such, the Defendant did not have any ability to pay the said money to the victim because he did not have any specific

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 10 million won from the victim to the agricultural bank account in the name of the defendant under the name of the defendant under the pretext of borrowing money.

2. On January 19, 2015, the Defendant borrowed funds from the Defendant at the same place as the foregoing 1.1. at the same time, on January 19, 2015, false statement was made to the said victim stating that “In addition, it is necessary to enter into a provisional housing contract, the Defendant borrowed funds from the Defendant.”

However, as stated in the above 1.1., the defendant did not have the intent to use it as the cost of signing a provisional contract, and did not have the ability to repay the above money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 1 million won from the victim, that is, from the victim, a delivery from the victim for the loan, and received 7 million won from the above 1.m. account on the same day and acquired it by fraud.

3. On February 25, 2015, the Defendant borrowed money from the Defendant, on February 25, 2015, concluded that “A house contract was entered into by the said victim before the F located in G in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-si, Young-si, and borrowed KRW 5 million as necessary for internal distribution and remodeling costs.”

However, since the defendant did not have entered into a contract, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention to use the money as expenses for delivery and remodeling, and did not have the ability to pay the above money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby deceivings the victim.

arrow