1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. 1) In the case of loans, etc. filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant, etc., Busan District Court 2006Kadan2274, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff is liable to pay KRW 1 million as compensation for tort, since the Plaintiff instigated the Defendant to attend as a witness and caused the Plaintiff to lose in the lawsuit. 2) In light of the records of evidence No. 1, C, the Plaintiff received a summary order (Dasan District Court 2007Da14969, Apr. 27, 2007) with a fine of KRW 1 million as perjury. 2) The summary of the above summary of the crime of the summary order is as follows: “C was the name of the Plaintiff on Nov. 21, 2006, Busan District Court 2006Da22744, Plaintiff B, etc., who was present as witness, and gave testimony to the Plaintiff 100,000,0000,000,000,000 testimony was not known to the Plaintiff.

3) However, the above facts alone are insufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant instigated the defendant to prove perjury, or that the defendant lost the lawsuit related thereto and caused damage to the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Accordingly, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit. (b) The plaintiff asserts that since the plaintiff lent the amount of KRW 10 million to the defendant by means of transfer to the passbook in the name of the co-defendant E, the defendant, the co-defendant in the first instance court, who is the defendant's living together, the defendant, the defendant,

(The plaintiff added this part of the claim to the defendant at the trial). 2 Domination is about 10 million won, the plaintiff asserts that he lent to the defendant.