1. On May 23, 2014, the revocation of the driver’s license (Class II ordinary) issued by the Defendant against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 29, 2014, the Plaintiff (acquisition of Class I driver’s license for ordinary motor vehicles No. 2 on July 5, 2007) was found to have been exposed to the police’s drinking control on the front side of the main apartment road in front of the city of dispatching a week while driving B Poter cargo under the influence of alcohol content of 0.050% under the influence of alcohol at 0.050%.

B. On May 23, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition to revoke the second-class ordinary driving license to the Plaintiff as of June 10, 2014 on the ground of the third drunk driving.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

On June 30, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission rendered a ruling dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on July 22, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 10, Eul evidence 1, 6, 12, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The Plaintiff took a 5-year-old alcohol measurement for the blood alcohol concentration before the lapse of 30 minutes after the last alcohol alcohol measurement. From around 19:30 to 20:40 on the day of the instant case, the Plaintiff took part of 3 diseases per half-ro-ro, divided into 100 to 20:50 on the Plaintiff’s house, and sent 21:04 hours after waiting for a drinking measurement order. At the time of measurement, the Plaintiff took a 20-year-old alcohol concentration measurement for the blood alcohol concentration before the lapse of 30-05%, and the blood alcohol concentration was 0.05% at the time of the Plaintiff’s operation, and the Plaintiff’s blood alcohol concentration was 0.05% at the time of the Plaintiff’s operation, and the Plaintiff’s correction rate of 10-100% to 200-10.05%-1%-1%-1%-1%-20-3 months-20.