1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination on April 12, 2006 1 million UN

A. The plaintiff alleged on April 12, 2006 that the defendant did not have the intention or ability to newly construct the Section, and that he acquired the Section 1 million from the plaintiff to the plaintiff on April 12, 2006 by means of acquiring the said money in Korean currency from the plaintiff, thereby seeking a payment of the amount converted into Korean currency with compensation therefor. Thus, there is no dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff acquired the said money from the plaintiff (the defendant stated that "I will open Section 1," and that "C" was changed by purchasing the received money). This part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

B. The plaintiff, on April 12, 2006, donated 10 million U.N. to the defendant on April 12, 2006. However, the above gift contract asserted that it constitutes an unfair juristic act and sought the payment of the amount converted into Korean won as the return of unjust enrichment by asserting that it falls under an unfair juristic act and thus null and void. Thus, the plaintiff did not have any assertion or proof as to the specific facts supporting that the plaintiff had been in the state of flag, rashness, or experience at the time of donation, and therefore, the plaintiff'

2. Determination as to the sum of 32.3 million UN from May 22, 2006 to February 22, 2008

A. The plaintiff's assertion asserts that the plaintiff lent a total of 3.2 million UN to the defendant from May 22, 2006 to February 22, 2008, and that the plaintiff claimed the return of the amount calculated by deducting 5 million UN from the above money to 2.7.3 million UN, which was converted into Korean won.

B. The fact that the plaintiff paid the defendant a sum of 32.3 million UN to the defendant is not disputed between the parties, but between the parties.