A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a part-time motor vehicle agency with the trade name of "E" in Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City D.

In fact, the defendant is not entitled to succeed to or transfer to another person the status of the part agency of the motor vehicle part of the motor vehicle part of the motor vehicle part of the motor vehicle part of the motor vehicle part of the defendant, and there was no authority to designate a new part agency as the part agency of the motor vehicle part of the motor vehicle part.

Nevertheless, around July 18, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim H to transfer E, which is the part agency of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of part of

Therefore, the Defendant received 240 million won from the victim to the Busan bank account in the name of the Defendant, in other words, from the victim to the above E-transfer price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (referring to questioning and reply to the head office of the projects south of Busan Metropolitan City);

1. In light of the circumstances, such as the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts and the relevant provision of Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment, the transfer of automobile parts agency for the reason of sentencing does not consist of a defendant’s unilateral intent, and there is no evidence to deem that there was a criminal intent of defraudation by the defendant, even after having used money from the victim, that there was no inquiry or consultation about the transfer of agent on the side of Manosung Motor.