A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

All applications filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of the Dispute Resolution E, who mainly engages in the business of importing household products in Japan and supplying and selling them to large-scale discount stores, such as Empt and Home Plus.

In 2010, the defendant, by the FF's recommendation that supplied goods to the KOE, entrusted the management of the FOE sales store and received goods deposit in return for the entrusted management of the FOE sales store and the FOE sales store. On September 2010, the defendant tried to expand the business through the FO business partnership with the FF around September 2010, and after attracting investors to the KOE through the start-up business partnership, he agreed to receive the investment money in the name of goods deposit in return for promising to give high profits to investors.

Therefore, the Defendant entered into an entrusted operation contract with the victim G and the victim to whom the place is unknown on September 18, 2010 through the business start-up consultant in order to pay KRW 100,000,000 for the goods deposit and KRW 10,000,000 for the entrusted operation expenses to the Homepller H store, to allow the victim to entrust the management of the Homepller H store, to deliver 4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00

However, if the above contract itself receives a large amount of investment as a security deposit, it was a structure for which the 4% of the above investment amount should be paid to every month investor, and if the profit is not paid for more than 2 months, the full amount of the security deposit for goods and the expenses for entrusted operation should be refunded to the investors, and if the investor wishes, the security deposit for goods should be refunded at any time. Accordingly, in order to deliver the high rate of profit and refund the security deposit for goods, the defendant continued to attract other investors to use it for the delivery of the security deposit for goods, or to receive the security deposit for goods from them, and the contract expires.