logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.03.11 2018가단260700
제작비 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The assertion;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant is a total of 12 gold forms, including C, from June 2015 to November 2016, 2016 (hereinafter “the gold form”).

) The Plaintiff ordered production to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff completed the production of gold-type 20, 100, 100, 200, 200, 300, 100, 300, 400, 13,000, 100, 100, 100, 100, 200, 200, 300, 100, 100, 100, 200, 30, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 200, 00, 200, 30, 100, 00, 200, 30, 00, 10,000, 00, 60,000, 130,00, 60,000, 10,000.

3) However, the Defendant only paid to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 19,734,00 (including additional tax), including KRW 1,078,00 on January 29, 2016, KRW 2,156,00 on February 29, 2016, KRW 16,500 on March 31, 2016, and KRW 16,50,000 on March 31, 2016, and the remainder is not paid on the ground that the transaction was suspended due to the Defendant’s failure to pass the Defendant’s verification. However, even if the condition that the Defendant should pass the Defendant’s verification as alleged by the Defendant, the Defendant must prove that the quality is inferior even if so, to receive the instant gold production cost.

arrow