1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport:

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the cases of cutting down or adding some contents as follows, and therefore, it is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) The grounds for appeal by the defendant are not different from the allegations in the first instance court, and the facts finding in the first instance court and the judgment are justifiable even if the evidence additionally submitted in the first instance court is delivered to the evidence that was adopted by the first instance court.

(a) Fourth (c) decision of the first instance court; and

1) The part of paragraph (1) of this Article is as follows. First, the defendant sold the part corresponding to 3,675.535 of each of the land of this case to J in accordance with the title trust agreement entered into between the plaintiffs and J. Thus, the purchaser of the above part is not the plaintiffs but the J.

(A) who is the party to the contract constitutes a matter of interpretation of the intent of the party involved in the contract.

The interpretation of expression of intent is to clearly define the objective meaning that the parties have given to the act of expression, and where the contents of a contract are written in writing, which is a disposal document, it shall not be cited in the text used in writing, but it shall reasonably interpret the objective meaning that the parties have given to the act of expression in writing, regardless of the internal intent of the parties. In this case, if the objective meaning of the text is clear, unless there are special circumstances, the existence and contents of the expression of intent shall be acknowledged

(B) The following circumstances revealed by the health team, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, and Eul evidence 2 as to the instant case (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Da5206, Oct. 31, 2013). (b) The witness of the first instance court, the witness of the first instance court, the witness K of the first instance court, and L’s testimony and arguments are as follows: (i) the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.