The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. A summary of the grounds for appeal (I) is in an improper relationship between the Defendant (I) and his husband, the husband of the case, and the Defendant (J: D: D: D: D: D) on multiple occasions telephone communications with the victim (H).

I think, in order to fluorize, only posted the same article as that of the facts charged on the mountain car page, and did not intend to damage the purpose or honor of the victim.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, which erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant left as “G” restaurant operated by the victim on January 10, 2016, according to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court.

In light of the fact that a letter S and the victim are in infinite relations, the victim did not have such fact, and the victim confirmed the content of his own currency suspected by the defendant, and the defendant posted a letter of the same content as the No. 1 of the facts charged on this day in the mountain conference. The above notice is that the husband S(J) assaulted the defendant and exchanged the telephone and text messages with other women and that the victim (H) made the statement to confirm the contents of the telephone, and the victim (H) did not change.

The content is that the defendant recorded the victim's speech in the above G cafeteria, etc., and thereby the victim conceals it while taking an inappropriate call and contact with S. ③ On January 12, 2016, the defendant visited the victim directly and visited the communications agency and received the entire monetary content from the victim, and confirmed that there was no monetary content with S. ④ Nevertheless, on the same day, the defendant again posted a notice on the bulletin board of the mountainous cafeteria stating the victim's telephone number, the victim's mother's telephone number, and the victim's telephone number, and the fact that it is doubtful that the victim sent it every day with S.