The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (amounting to eight million won, confiscation) is too unfased and unreasonable.

2. In particular, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months on November 26, 2014 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.), and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 4, 2014, and was still under suspended sentence.

However, in light of the favorable circumstances such as the defendant's mistake, the period of operation of the sexual traffic business establishment of this case is about 8 days, and there are no profits that the defendant has been committed, and the previous conviction is not the same as the previous conviction of this case, and the defendant does not have the same criminal record as the previous conviction of this case, and other favorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, occupation and environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too uneasible and unfair. Thus, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, however, the phrase “1.H’s protocol of interrogation of the suspect of the suspect of the police against F” in the summary column of the evidence under Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure refers to “1. F’s protocol of interrogation of the suspect of the police against F, and correction ex officio