1. The Defendant is based on the termination of title trust on July 23, 2015, on the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff.

The facts that the Defendant was the Plaintiff’s outer village, and the Plaintiff was the Defendant’s early September 2006, and the Defendant, in fact, purchased the automobiles listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) for the purpose of operation, and agreed to trust the Plaintiff with the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant title trust agreement”). The Defendant purchased the instant vehicle on September 22, 2006 in accordance with the instant title trust agreement and completed the ownership transfer registration under the Plaintiff’s name and is operating until now after delivery of the said vehicle. The fact that the instant complaint, stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the instant title trust agreement, delivered to the Defendant on July 23, 2015, did not conflict between the parties, or can be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings as indicated in subparagraphs A-1 and 2.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to accept from the plaintiff the transfer registration procedure for the instant motor vehicle on July 23, 2015 due to the termination of the instant title trust agreement.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and accepted.