logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.17 2016나2085751
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the acceptance and alteration of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and such reasoning is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for dismissal or addition as follows.

Part 3, "No. 20 November 20, 2012" in Part 5 shall be changed to " November 2, 2012".

Part 5. Sub-paragraph 7. “B.(2) No. 3” and “B.(3)” are added.

In Part 5, “The fact that the construction had not been carried out” in Part 12, followed the following: “At the time of the seizure, the enforcement officer added the attachment of H-type lecture 2,200 tons at the site after hearing the words “The President had purchased tin Construction to its employees at the site of the construction of the Y-type curriculum 1,070 tons (2,200 tons)” from the construction site of the Y-type curriculum 2,200 tons at the time of the seizure.”

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow