1. The Plaintiff’s obligation of management expenses to the Defendant from July 24, 2018 to January 31, 2019 does not exist.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of Seosan City B apartment C (hereinafter “instant apartment”) who was awarded a successful bid in the auction process and completed the registration of ownership transfer on July 24, 2018, and the Defendant is the Council of Rental Business Operators established to manage the said B apartment.

B. Meanwhile, the defendant may take measures, such as filing a lawsuit, where the tenant fails to pay the management expenses, etc. for at least two months even after the letter of demand is issued by the management authority, because the former owner of the apartment of this case has failed to pay the management expenses for a long period.

and the Defendant Resolution of September 18, 2014

3. From 2016 to 2016, the case of collecting management expenses and management expenses (including the monthly management expenses) for the second month (including the first month), the apartment of this case was subject to a water supply restriction measure for the apartment of this case. However, when the owner of the apartment of this case was changed to the plaintiff and the plaintiff requested the plaintiff to cancel the water supply restriction measure, the defendant requested the plaintiff to pay to the plaintiff all of KRW 2,734,70, and KRW 339,360, and KRW 120,000, which are the amount including the late payment charges for the entire management expenses unpaid, and KRW 339,360, which are the amount including the late payment charges for the entire management expenses, and KRW 120,000, which are unpaid by the previous owner.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. A. The summary of the parties’ assertion 1 acquisition of ownership of the apartment of this case by the Plaintiff and the former owner is unpaid management expenses.