logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.05.21 2013고단200
건설산업기본법위반
Text

Defendant

A, B, and D shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Defendant

A, B, and D respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of a new building with a total floor area of 1,407.49 square meters above H ground in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and Defendant D and B are the contractors entrusted by Defendant A, and Defendant C is the employees of “I Office”.

Defendants, when the constructor’s construction business registration certificate was required to carry out the above construction work, are gathered to obtain a lease. Defendant C, around July 25, 201, requested to lend his name-free employees and her construction business registration certificate to Defendant D at the distance prior to the Namwon National Call Office in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Inc., and Defendant A, at a place where the same day cannot be known, wired 25 million won, including the money in the license loan, to Defendant D, and wired 205 million won to Defendant B at a place where the same day cannot be known, and Defendant B wired 205 million won out of the above money to Defendant C at the place where the same day cannot be known, and Defendant C wired her money to Defendant C at around the 27th of the same month. Defendant C transferred 205 million won from the above money to Defendant C.

8.2.In no known place, the court accepted all documents related to the construction business registration certificate of the J and received the said money to the competent authorities and had the Defendant D and B perform the said construction work.

As a result, Defendants conspired to borrow a construction business registration certificate from a constructor.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant

A

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Part concerning the statement made by the prosecution against the defendant A in the protocol of suspect interrogation;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against Defendant D or C by the prosecution;

1. Statement of suspect interrogation by the prosecution against the defendant B (including the part concerning the statement of C and D);

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the public prosecutor in K;

1. Statement of the police concerning L;

1. B AC Account Statement, C C Company Bank Account Statement, Defendant B, C, and D

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the public prosecutor in K;

1. Statement of the police concerning L;

1. A AC Account Statement and C Company Bank Account Statement.

arrow