1. The plaintiff's all claims against the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a company with the purpose of developing and teaching English learning programs, and is the Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”). In addition, Defendant B and Defendant C together are also companies with the purpose of developing and teaching English learning programs.

The defendant company is both the company in which E actually operated, and E died on September 26, 2014.

After the death of E, F, a female employee of E, has taken office as the representative director of the defendant company and operates the defendant company.

Defendant D succeeded to E’s property as E’s South Korean partner.

As of December 11, 2013, Defendant C entered into a lease agreement with G to lease the H building 901 and 902 in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, G from KRW 501 and 902, and KRW 3.3 million in monthly rent (B) (i) around that time, Defendant C transferred the above Nos. 901 and 902, and operated “I” as the English Private Teaching Institute, Young-si, Young-si.

As of July 1, 2014, the Defendant C delayed to pay the monthly rent for at least two months, G, on July 1, 2014, notified Defendant C of the termination of the said lease.

Defendant C, the actual operator of Defendant C, agreed to reinstate the said I shop between G and the lessee.

[Grounds for recognition] Gap 1-1, 1-2, 4, 6, 10, 1-7 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The plaintiff's assertion of the parties is operating the Indiana Corporation. On October 2014, the plaintiff's husband J concluded a construction contract between the defendant company and the defendant company to undertake the restoration work of the first point operated by the defendant company for KRW 34320,000,00,000, and the above construction is completed. As such, the defendant company is jointly obligated to pay the plaintiff the above KRW 34322,00,000, and the defendant D actually operates the defendant company as the sole heir of the defendant company, and therefore, the above construction cost is paid in accordance with the legal principles of the denial of