(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.11.25 2020고정204

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.11.25 2020고정204

과실치상

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2019, around 13:00, the Defendant found the victim D (Inn, 58 years of age) of B Apartment-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul, the Defendant’s residence, and said the Defendant would go E in a large way outside of the door where he met the Defendant’s three villages E.

I tried to enter the defendant's house into the defendant's house.

In such a case, the defendant has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of danger because there is a high possibility that the entrance door might be closed.

The Defendant neglected this and caused injury to the other hand flabing flabing flabing off which requires 42-day medical treatment by closing the door at the right flab in the state where the flabing of the flab with the flab by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of a photograph of damage submitted by the victim);

1. A report on investigation (Attachment of a record);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates and injury medical certificates;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant is punishable by the victim and the victim.

The fact that the door door is closed is recognized, but the defendant tried to enter the dwelling of the defendant against the will of the defendant before closing the door, and the defendant prevented the defendant from entering the dwelling of the defendant, and closed the door after paying the victim. The victim does not have the door, and because the defendant does not have the door, he was injured by the wind to open the door, the defendant does not violate his duty of care.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the victim found E in the Defendant’s dwelling to visit E, but the Defendant said E to return to the Defendant without wanting to visit the victim.

참조조문

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.01.25 2012고정439

-서울남부지방법원 2020.12.22 2019노2794

-의정부지방법원 2015.12.21 2015고정2239

-수원지방법원 2020.10.07 2020고단1708 (1)

-울산지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고정536