Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 26, 2017, at around 00:15, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, was drunkly drunk within the “E” drinking house located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, and called to the site on the 112 report without any reason, the Defendant “Isle police kis” to the FJ G.

Doesever reported.

Chewing gar. We see this gar, knee, knenee, knenee, kneee, knee, knee, with the victim's knee, hume the victim's knee with the victim's knee.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

2. The Defendant’s insultd the Defendant at the time, time, and place under paragraph 1, and at the place where the employee and the customer are located, “I have why the police kids have been damaged;

Pursuant to whom it was reported;

Chewingly, the victim openly insultd the victim by speaking it in a large sound, such as sheging, sheging, sheging, and sheging as Neh’s mar.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable condition: The defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake.

There is no record of punishment other than punishment for the defendant who has already been punished once by a fine.

An unfavorable circumstance: A police officer.