The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (No. 4344 of the High Court Decision 2015 Madan 43344), which was located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, as a witness, in the court of separate jurisdiction No. 4 of the said court.

Defendant D’s counsel for the examination of the foregoing case, “I do not seem to have any “Is the witness prior to that end in April and there is a dispute between E (the mother of D) and the witness, who wishes to take waste inside the house of the weather. Is the witness, “Is to see that Is Is E’t have any desire to “Is am superior and Is am hys hys hys hys hys and fys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys.”

“The testimony was made.”

However, at the time, at the time, the Defendant told E that “Isson is the superior in which Isphers are carrying garbage at the house in the weather, and Isphers acop year Isphers acop, and Isphers acopic year.”

As above, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime (elective of penalty);

1. Penalty of a fine not exceeding 1,000,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one hundred thousand won per day converted);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the Defendant has no previous conviction, and the investigative agency denied it by the investigation agency, but in the court, the entire crime of this case was committed and the mistake was committed.

The defendant has been given an appraisal due to civil disputes, etc.

E In relation to the case against which he was threatened by the D, he was present and testified as a victim, and unless related to the issues of the above case, there is reason to consider the circumstance as follows.