logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.11 2016가단5206836
양수금
Text

1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A: 15,035,670 won and 8,695 thereof.

Reasons

On November 30, 2006, the Plaintiff has a claim for transfer money (35,083,230 won and damages for delay) determined by the Daegu District Court Decision 2006Kadan129316 Decided November 30, 2006.

The deceased E died on October 17, 2010, and the Defendants were the successors.

The Defendants, based on the Daegu District Court's Family Branch Decision 2010Ra3040 dated January 26, 201, approved the deceased D's inherited property.

[Ground of recognition] According to the facts of recognition of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendants inherited the debts based on the above judgment within the scope of the property inherited from the networkF. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.

Therefore, within the scope of property inherited from the network D, Defendant A is obligated to pay 15,035,670 won (35,083,230 won x 3/7), Defendant B and C respectively (35,083,230 won x 2/7) and damages for delay.

Since the plaintiff's claim is accepted, it is decided as per the disposition.

arrow