1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to A vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) and B (hereinafter “victims vehicles”), and the Defendant is the insurer who has concluded the automobile insurance contract with respect to C vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. At around 08:50 on March 16, 2015, D, driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle, driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle, proceeding along the one-lane near the eductal road located in the Sungdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, the direction of the educulation in the direction of the intersection, and, due to the negligence of entering the said intersection in violation of the vehicle stop signal, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was driven on the right side of the road and the left-hand turn according to the vehicle moving signal, and the shocked the e-driving Defendant’s vehicle, the damaged vehicle was facing the said intersection.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

피해 차량의 운전자 F은 이 사건 사고 당시 피해 차량이 피고 차량과 위와 같이 재차 충돌하기 직전에 원고 차량의 피해 차량 충격 여파로 피해 차량의 유리창을 뚫고 피해 차량 밖으로 튕겨져 나가 피고 차량에 부딪힌 다음 아스팔트 도로에 낙하되었고, 이로 인하여 약 10주간의 치료를 요하는 경추 제3번 척추경 및 우하측 관절돌기 골절 등의 상해(이하 ‘이 사건 상해’라 한다)를 입게 되었다. 라.

After that, until May 26, 2016, the Plaintiff paid the insurance proceeds of KRW 405,880,010 in total to the victim F as the insurer of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, with medical expenses, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including provisional numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle is proceeding by entering the above intersection in violation of the vehicle signal at the time of the instant accident.