1. The plaintiff, the defendant corporation, the 24,833,940 won for the defendant corporation, the 2,500,000 won for the defendant corporation, and the above 2,500 won for the defendant corporation.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including household numbers) as to the claim against the defendant corporation's credit, the plaintiff company may recognize the fact that the defendant company supplied goods to the defendant company from June 2012 to June 2015, or was supplied with goods from the defendant company on December 17, 2015, 257,775,760, excluding 11,976,00 won from the price of goods supplied, and the price of goods supplied at KRW 220,965,820 from the defendant company was paid only the remainder of KRW 24,83,940 from the price of goods supplied to the defendant company.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant company is obligated to pay 24,83,940 won for the unpaid goods to the plaintiff company and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum (the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case) from March 9, 2017 to the day of full payment, which the plaintiff company seeks after the date of supplying the goods to the defendant company.

As to this, the Defendant Company shall receive KRW 11,773,90,00, in total, from the Plaintiff Company for fees for the construction of facilities for landscaping in Yyangyang Middle Schools, and KRW 6,917,90, in total, KRW 4,856,400 for the construction of government-funded materials among public rental apartment landscaping works in the Gwangju High Village, and the Defendant Company paid KRW 1,650,00 for the construction cost for defect repair as a defect occurred in the luminous Hanyang River and Middle School bicycle storage facilities established by the Plaintiff Company, and the Plaintiff Company is anticipated to pay KRW 1,210,00,000 for the repair works of the Yongyang Daegu High School established by the Plaintiff Company. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the Defendant Company’s above assertion is not acceptable.

Therefore, the plaintiff company's claim shall be accepted for the reasons of the judgment as per Disposition.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.

(a) the reasons for the attachment of the claim;