logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2017.04.21 2017고단40
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who, in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act, drives a cargo vehicle B and one ton of a cargo vehicle.

On January 26, 2017, the Defendant, around 13:50 on January 26, 2017, went into the south side of the water station from the boundary of the water station to the south side of the water station.

Since there are vehicles that had been running earlier at the time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by thoroughly operating the steering gear and operating the steering gear accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to find out the F SP car of the victim E (60) driving that was driven by negligence while neglecting the license without permission, and was behind the said vehicle as the front part of the said cargo vehicle.

After all, the defendant injured the victim E by the above occupational negligence such as salt, tensions, etc. of chills that need to be treated for about three weeks, and suffered injury to the victim G (the 56 years old) who is the passenger of the above car, such as salt, tensions, etc. of chills that require approximately three weeks of treatment, and damaged the above car so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 630,990 can be assessed.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of drinking), Defendant 1 caused a traffic accident as above at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (1), and Defendant 2 was driven under the influence of alcohol by considering that Defendant 1 was smelled from the Defendant, Defendant’s speech and behavior are divided into several sides, and Defendant 2 was sprinked on the face.

have reasonable grounds to determine that there is a reasonable

On January 26, 2017, from 14:40 on January 26, 2017 to 30 minutes, the defendant requested the defendant to respond to the measurement through the respiratory measuring method.

Nevertheless, the defendant may demand a police officer to take a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

arrow