1. The defendant received on May 16, 2001 from the Suwon District Court registry office with respect to the real estate stated in the attached list from the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) is owned by the Plaintiff. At the time of the provisional registration of this case by the Defendant, the Defendant’s name was C, but the name was changed on December 9, 201, and was changed to the current name on December 9, 201. The real estate of this case was completed the provisional registration of the ownership transfer claim based on the purchase and sale promise as of May 16, 2001 (hereinafter “the provisional registration of this case”).

B. D is the defendant's fault, E is the father of the plaintiff, and F is the father of E.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's entries in Gap's 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The legal nature of the provisional registration of this case is whether the provisional registration is the provisional registration of this case, and it is determined by whether the provisional registration is the real purpose of collateral security, not by the formal description as to whether the cause of the registration of this case is the trade reservation, or not, or by the form as to whether it is entered in the accord and satisfaction reservation.

(2) The provisional registration of this case is determined as falling under the provisional registration of security, and there is no dispute as to whether the provisional registration of this case was made for the security of obligation, according to the evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings as seen earlier, based on the overall purport of the evidence and the argument as seen earlier.

Although the defendant asserts to the effect that the plaintiff's argument is not clear in relation to this, as stated in the first page of the legal brief dated October 24, 2016, the plaintiff clearly stated that the legal nature of the provisional registration of this case is regarded as a provisional registration for security.

B. The Plaintiff asserted that the secured debt of the provisional registration of this case is the secured debt of this case to the effect that the secured debt of this case is 30 million won due to the non-party F’s debt to the Defendant, and that the non-party F is the amount of 11 million won due to the non-party F’s debt.