All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (the imprisonment of eight months, 40 hours, e.g., confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s above sentence is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected, and that the above victims do not want punishment against the defendant by mutual consent with some victims, and that the defendant deposited for the J of the victim.

On the other hand, in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant planned access to the victims to take care of the victim by dialogue, etc.; (b) the nature of the crime is significant; (c) the victim is many victims; (d) the Defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime; (c) the number of victims has not yet been taken from many victims; and (d) other factors of sentencing revealed in the course of the pleading of the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing was too heavy or hurdly exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.