beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for four months.
, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendants’ co-principal
A. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint violence) was committed between the Defendants, who were punished, and around December 21, 2013, at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D (29 years of age) in Ulsan-gun C on December 12, 2013, when drinking alcohol and drinking alcohol as a matter of child education.
The Defendants, on the ground that they are able to return home because they interfere with the business of the victim, he saw the face of the victim one time by drinking, and Defendant B marks the shape of the Defendant.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.
B. On December 12, 2013, from around 20:50 to 21:30 of the same day, Defendants who interfere with the performance of their duties did not look at each other from the above main points operated by the victim D for the same reasons as the preceding paragraph. Defendant A her disturbance, such as having a monitor who was on the knickter, etc., Defendant B, who was off the clothes, and other customers who had performed drinking at the knick, displayed their body with the appearance of “welves, whether you want to go back, and immediately left the knick.”
As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's bar business by force.
2. Defendant A
A. On December 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 20:50 on December 2013, 2013, at the main point operated by the Victim D, the Defendant: (b) took a dynamic B and Si guard as referred to in subparagraph 1(a); (c) took a beer’s remote area as a beer’s disease; (d) took a beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer; and (e)
At around 21:20 on the same day, the Defendant continued to gather one computer monitor at the floor on the ground that the surrounding customers were fluoring themselves who had a disturbance, and caused to tear.
Accordingly, the defendant damages the victim's property to be 3.1 million won of the repair cost.