(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.12.12 2013고단973

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.12.12 2013고단973

사기등

Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 973"

1. A thief: (a) around 02:30 on May 30, 2013, the Defendant: (b) took alcohol at the “Dju store” located in Asan City; (c) took advantage of the gap of neglect of caution; (d) took advantage of the difference of the market price of 1,000,000 won owned by the employee victim E, who was taking advantage of the gap, the Defendant stolen and stolen property worth KRW 1,80,000, total of 1,800,000 with an interview mobile phone owned by 1,00,000 won at the market price of 80,000,000.

2. On May 30, 2013, around 05:36, the Defendant made a false statement as if the Defendant would pay the Defendant with the Defendant’s payment of the price at the “H key point” in the “H key point” of the Victim G management in Asia-si, Asan-si.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the defendant was provided with alcohol, speech, etc. from the victim.

The Defendant provided the victim with an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 50,000,00, which is the sum of the market price of KRW 20,000,00, and KRW 30,000,000, such as the market price of KRW 50,000, and acquired it by fraud. The Defendant provided the singing service equivalent to KRW 20,00,000, and provided the entertainment equivalent to the service fee of KRW 25,00, and did not pay the service fee of KRW 25,00.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the property equivalent to the total market value of 95,00 won and acquired the property profit.

On November 20, 2013, 2013, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol as if he would pay the alcohol value to the victim to the victim in the 6th place of the "Kjuk Point in the operation of the victim JJ on the I underground floor in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si."

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any other way to pay the drinking value while there was no money at the time, and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the said price even if the Defendant was provided with alcoholic beverage and alcohol by the victim.

In other words, the defendant is the victim from the victim.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2012.11.30 2012고단3655

-인천지방법원 2014.10.16 2014고단359

-서울북부지방법원 2015.02.13 2014고단4199

-서울동부지방법원 2014.07.02 2014고단529

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.08.28 2014고단568