The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

A. With regard to the mistake of facts, the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case by misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, even though the Defendant did not spite the victim with the victim, etc. on a multiple occasions, such as the statement in the facts charged, and there is no fact that the victim spits it against the victim.

B. Even if there is no unreasonable sentencing, the lower court’s sentencing (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts are consistent from the investigative agency to the court below, namely, ① the victim E consistently met with the investigative agency to the court below's court, on July 12, 2012, the defendant suffered bodily injury, such as a tent spelf, etc. when the victim was spited by the columns that were faced by him, and on July 16, 2012, the defendant spited and spited the victim. ② at the investigative agency and the court below at the time, F.F. at the investigative agency and the court below, the defendant tried to spel the victim while trying to do so, and the victim was faced with the columns at the time, and the victim was spited with the victim who was satisfyd from the subway station to the court below's court. ③ According to the facts charged by the defendant, the defendant's testimony and the fact that the victim was satisfyd with the victim's body.