The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a doctor who operates the “D Hospital” on the fifth floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building.

A medical person shall prepare medical records, etc. and record the matters and opinions concerning his/her medical practice in detail and preserve them, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare.

Nevertheless, around December 6, 2010, the Defendant, at the above hospital, performed a flexible expansion operation to E, a patient, did not enter the name, capacity, and frequency of taking, etc. of the anti-biotic system in the medical records even though the Defendant prescribed that the anti-biotic system, which is an anti-biotic system, should be recovered three times a day, and seven days, was not entered in the medical records. On the 12th of the same month, the Defendant prescribed three-generations against the above E, who is an anti-biotic system, and did not enter the specific name, capacity, frequency of taking, and period of taking, etc. of the anti-biotic system in the medical records.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Medical records;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the submission of reference materials to complainants);

1. Article 90 of the Medical Service Act and Articles 90 and 22 (1) of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for conviction under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion

A. 1) Regarding the medical records dated December 6, 2010, with regard to medical records, the doctor’s prescription after the flexible expansion surgery was standardized, and the defendant provided the nurse with a pre-explosive resuscitation to prescribe after the flexible expansion surgery, and there is no need to enter the name, capacity, and the number of uniforms in the medical records on December 12, 2010, with regard to the medical records dated December 12, 2010, as long as the prescription was issued, it is possible to confirm through the prescription if necessary, it is difficult to enter the name, capacity, and the number of uniforms in the medical records.