A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant came to know at a general restaurant operated by the Victim B, and lived with the victim from July 2008 to May 2012.

1. Around February 20, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s house located in the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, stating that “If the Defendant borrowed money to carry out graveyard projects in the south of Korea, it would be repaid without molding it.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the above amount even if he borrowed the above amount from the victim because he had a debt of about 40 million won at the time.

As such, the Defendant was given 20 million won on the same day under the pretext of borrowing money from the victim by deceiving the victim as such.

2. Around November 12, 2009, the Defendant stated that “A victim, such as a traffic accident, will be repaid if 2.5 million won is lent.” The Defendant borrowed 2.5 million won from the victim’s house, such as paragraph (1), in front of the Masan-dong, Simsan-dong, Simsan-dong, Simsan-dong, Seoul-si, the same as

However, even if the above money was borrowed, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2.5 million on the same day under the pretext of borrowing money from the victim.

3. On January 28, 2010, the Defendant stated, “Around January 28, 2010, the Defendant loaned KRW 5 million to the victim at the same place as Paragraph 1.”

However, even if the above money was borrowed, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received five million won on the same day under the pretext of borrowing money from the victim.

4. On May 17, 2010, the Defendant stated, “Around May 17, 2010, the Defendant loaned KRW 10 million to the victim at a place, such as Paragraph 1, that “a debt would go beyond the house.”

However, even if the above money was borrowed, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such and belongs to it from the victim.